Are wild cards available in web page find yet?

All WYSIWYG Web Builder support issues that are not covered in the forums below.
Forum rules
IMPORTANT NOTE!!

DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION OR PROBLEM AND WANT QUICK HELP?
THEN PLEASE SHARE A "DEMO" PROJECT.



PLEASE READ THE FORUM RULES BEFORE YOU POST:
http://www.wysiwygwebbuilder.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1901

MUST READ:
http://www.wysiwygwebbuilder.com/getting_started.html
WYSIWYG Web Builder FAQ
Post Reply
bowlesj
 
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:59 pm

Are wild cards available in web page find yet?

Post by bowlesj »

Hi,

I am using WYSIWYG version 9.4.4. Finally I discovered (right click, find page) within the site manager. Unfortunately it does not have the any number of any characters wild card that are available in UNIX as ".*" or "%" or just "*" in other languages such as MS-Access. It also seems to have no help or no easy way to find out more about it. Does the latest version have this along with some help.

Why am I asking? I wrote a 200+ page site then when it failed I salvaged it for personal fun use using maybe 20 of those pages + a lot of help pages I write after that for my jazz friends that get involved in using the site for our jazz jams (no income in this website). I am reluctant to delete any of the old pages. I am reluctant to sort them. So I end up scrolling every single time.

Thanks,
John
User avatar
Pablo
 
Posts: 22164
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Europe
Contact:

Re: Are wild cards available in web page find yet?

Post by Pablo »

First note that version 9 is very old an no longer supported.
In more recent versions, 'find page' has been replaced with a search filter, which means that if you type only a few letters, then all pages that match will be displayed.
bowlesj
 
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:59 pm

Re: Are wild cards available in web page find yet?

Post by bowlesj »

Okay thanks Pablo.

My pages have a long grouping text at the front so that is not of much use. I may sort them as an experiment.

John
Post Reply